A voice for private property rights

By ELLIOT ZUCKER

Some time ago I was asked to put together an article explaining my perspective on the proposals presented by the visioning committee at meetings that I have attended. I certainly appreciate the opportunity to express my dissent.

I have several points on which I find the current “conservation development” plans leave a very sour taste in my mind. The most important point is in the area of private property rights. Space limitations prevent me from giving a detailed explanation of any one point. Therefore, here is a list, in no particular order, of a few of these points along with a brief indication of my position on the matter. Some of these points may well be just a matter of perspective, and I am more than willing to hold a dialog with those who support the initiative.

One specific point is that I have not seen anything resembling credentials held by the supporters that would give me reason to suspect that they have anything beyond personal bias upon which to base their positions. I have not spent time learning about medieval French literature and will not pretend to know anything about that field. I expect a similar courtesy from those who did study it not to pretend to be experts in fields such as ecology, limnology and population dynamics. Stating something loudly, frequently and with great conviction does not make it so. Having knowledge of ones subject to back up one’s convictions is the most honest form of persuasion.

There is a difference between a postulate and a demonstrated fact. Any “assumed” fact can always be trumped by reality. Empirical is always the best flavor of evidence. When the various parts of the “conservation development plan” are presented, they are never accompanied by evidence that they have ever led to a superior outcome. The few examples that I have seen presented resemble nothing more than instant slums. High-density living is what many people come to rural places to get away from.

Another point is that, over the years I have learned that no law is immutable. When I opened my first bank account, the interest I earned on deposits was not taxable. When I started paying Social Security taxes, the benefits to be derived from that system were never going to be taxable (and I would be able to fully retire at age 65). The belief that any regulations passed to foster the “conservation development plan” would be immune from later changes is naïve, at best.

There is frequently a difference between the words that get used in making presentations and the actual intent behind the presentation. While all of the rhetoric surrounding the “conservation development” system sounds very Gaia-friendly and Bambi-o-centric, the actual effect of most of the proposals are more like rampant isolationism (now that I got here, slam the door and pull up the drawbridge). The ideal time for door slamming and drawbridge pulling up appears to be about 10 minutes after the speaker moved here.

The belief in “one-size-fits-all” zoning for the entire upper Delaware corridor is absurd fantasy at first glance. Even discounting the fact that one commonwealth and one state are involved, there are significant differences between the situations in the townships on either bank of the river. In the case of at least one township, a significant fraction of the area is already removed from potential development. This situation alone seems to obviate the reason given by the proponents for considering the adoption of “conservation development planning” in the first place.

These are some of the points of difference between my views and those of the self-appointed “visioning committee.” Any of these points and several more could be the subject of a complete article. I appreciate the opportunity to express my views.

[Elliot Zucker is a trustee of the Shohola Railroad and Historical Society and an alternate member of the Shohola Township Zoning Hearing Board.]

To contribute to this column contact editor@riverreporter.com. For a complete archive of visioning statements go to upperdelaware.com.

October 29, 2009 WES GILLINGHAM: The Catskills' future is up to us September 3, 2009 JEFFREY MOORE: Destroying it won't 'save'it August 6, 2009 BARBARA LEWIS: Trees: a legacy and a future July 9, 2009 SARAH CUTLER: Share the road June 11, 2009 SUSAN SCOTT: The democratization of information May 14, 2009 MICHAEL CHOJNICKI: A turning point April 16, 2009 JOHN CONWAY: Dual-mode transportation March 19,2009 KEITH LEPAN: NY H2O February 19, 2009 JEFFREY SEEDS: One-sidedness January 17, 2009 TOM HOLMES: Taking back the power December 25, 2008 TINA PALACEK: When a community is really a family November 27, 2008 STEPHANIE TURNER: Gas drilling from a realtor's perspective October 30, 2008 SUSAN SULLIVAN: From visiong to reality: the role of local government October 2, 2008 MARY BETH WOOD: Investing in career and technical education September 4, 2008 JOE LEVINE: When compromise is a recipe for disaster August 7, 2008 VIDAL MARTINEZ: The Upper Delaware experience July 10, 2008 WES GILLINGHAM: Sticking together June 12, 2008 LINDA COBB: The Harmony Project May 15, 2008 Barbara Arrindell: Looking back April 17, 2008 JO CLEARWATER: Welcome to the new world March 20, 2008 JONATHAN F. ROUIS: Out of many, one February 21, 2008 MIKE URETSKY: Mired in gas January 24, 2008 Some visionaries look at 2008 October 4, 2007 Greg Swarz: Coming Home September 6, 2007 Jim Serio: Educating the Delaware River Basin August 9, 2007 Stephanie Streeter: Still endangered? July 26, 2007 Molly Rodgers: Be informed, be connected July 12, 2007 Brad Krumholz: The landscape mind June 28, 2007 John Bunting: Milk price and power June 14, 2007 Brian Smith: It's time to work and worry May 31, 2007 Carol Roig: Celebrating history close to home May 17, 2007 Debbie Smorto: Be a part of the solution April 19, 2007 Robert Dadras: Creating a new direction for Sullivan County April 5, 2007 Dave Williams: Save your local dairy farm March 22, 2007 R.A. Dubensky: Losing our future March 8, 2007 Dave Williams: Save your local dairy farm February 22, 2007 Troy Bystrom: Conserve to preserve February 8, 2007 Alegra Jennings: Do you see what I see? January 18, 2007 Amy Gruzesk: A new alliance for business in Pike January 11, 2007 Grace Wildermuth: Our rural environment must be preserved December 28, 2006 John Jose: Meeting the challenges of stormwater management December 14, 2006 Daniel Kennedy: Making memories in Pike County November 30, 2006 Stephen Stuart: Sustainable Solutions November 16, 2006 Linda Cobb: The Harmony Project November 2, 2006 Judy Harlan: What municipalities can do about flooding October 19, 2006 Samuel Jackson: Walking the talk October 5, 2006 Jay Epstein: The foundations of a viable plan September 14, 2006 Tom Kane: The clean water act September 7, 2006 Skip Mendler: A community of communities August 24, 2006 FREDERICA LEIGHTON: Flood reality: vision or the lack of it August 10, 2006 DICK RISELING: A vision of actions July 27, 2006 PAT CARULLO AND MARCIA NEHEMIAH: Red plus blue equals green July 13, 2006 Neal Halloran: Greenway: a program whose time has come June 29, 2006 Steven Sharoff: Strong visions can change the world June 15, 2006 Heinrich Strauch: Cooking up a vision June 1, 2006 Jennifer C.S. Brylinski: The IDA keeps to its vision May 18, 2006 Norma and Bob Santee: Maintaining our environment May 4, 2006 Don Parry: The “vision thing” April 20, 2006 Joe Walsh: Keeping farms a mainstay of Sullivan County April 6, 2006 Heather Brown: Why I came here, and what keeps me here March 23, 2006 Pat Carullo: We are with the program March 09, 2006 Helen Budrock: The power of proactive thinking February 23, 2006 Carol Collier: A basin-wide collaboration February 9, 2006 Barbara Leo: A birding trail for the Upper Delaware January 26, 2006 Virginia Kennedy: Our vision—economic and environmental sustainability January 12, 2006 Tom Zeterburg: At the crossroads of two rivers December 29, 2005 Sally Corrigan: Hallmarks of a successful community December 15, 2005 “Better Models for Development” scores a hit - a compilation by Tom Kane and the Visioning Committee December 1, 2005 Brian Stuart: Protecting an amazing backyard resource November 17, 2005 John LiGreci: The need for a master plan November 3, 2005 Tom Kane: The need for intelligent land use practices October 20, 2005 Michael Chojnicki: The need for intelligent land use practices October 6, 2005 Alan Schadt: The Town of Highland through a crystal ball September 22, 2005 Ernie Mattern: Comprehensive Planning in Damascus September 8, 2005 Jerry DaBrescia: Visioning in Hancock August 25, 2005 Neal Halloran: Ways to secure open space August 11, 2005 Clem Fullerton: Flow woes August 11, 2005 Tom Kane: Options for preserving open space July 28, 2005 Charlie Buterbaugh: Fishing Days Gone July 28, 2005 George Fluhr: What's special about this place June 30, 2005 Tom Kane: There are many visions in the river valley June 30, 2005 Mary Curtis: My vision for the Upper Delaware River June 16, 2005 Sarah Sutto-Plunz: It depends on us June 16, 2005 Green buildings: a healthy revolution in the construction industry June 2, 2005 Pat Carullo: If horses can fly, rivers can speak! May 19, 2005 Laurie Stuart: A view from the ridge April 21, 2005 Rosie Starr: Preserving the Beauty of the Delaware River Valley April 7, 2005 Robert Burrow: Developing a plan takes study March 24, 2005 Tom Kane: Comprehensive Plan: The Key to the Future March 10, 2005 Katharine Dodge: We have a choice: aggressiveness or fairness February 24, 2005 Editorial: A tide in the affairs of men February 24, 2005 Jim Greier: Let’s not put our eggs in one basket February 10, 2005 Elliot Zucker: A voice for private property rights January 27, 2005 Steve Daley : Visions of business growth and home ownership January 13, 2005 Laura Quigley : Living and working in the land of plenty December 30, 2004 Dr. Martin Handler : My list of visions December 16, 2004 Dr. Bruce Getzan : Bringing harmony to contrasting visions December 2, 2004 Sally Talaga : Visioning’s first step November 18, 2004 Michele Ulmer : Be involved before it’s too late November 4, 2004 Marcia Nehemiah: It's all about the river October 21, 2004 John Drobysh: Balancing preservation with property rights October 7, 2004 Jeffrey Moore: Raising the standards in the river valley September 23, 2004 Dimitri Zaimes: The right and wrong of the Upper Delaware September 9, 2004 Frederica Leighton: Combining hindsight, foresight, present awareness and action August 26, 2004 Krista Gromalski: Turning the Conversation Up August 12, 2004 Jo Clearwater: Visioning July 29, 2004 Noel Van Swol: What about Property Rights? July 15, 2004 Cindy Wildermuth: A call for stewardship July 1, 2004 Tom Kane: Taking stock of the visioning process June 17, 2004 Dick Riseling: Sustainability and justice is at the heart of vision June 3, 2004 Peter Pinchot: Exurban sprawl or livable communities?